so if they are your friends and you know they fit the description of this network I guess go ahead. Maybe put their names (name of their collective/coop) here so it can be documented
I guess “vouching” can take the form of people “thumbing up” on the lab issue. Thumbing up then means you know the people, have reviewed the change and you agree with it.
Sounds fine. However, it may be worth to add some note about organisational structure (for-profit motives? hierarchical structure?). I think we should push ourselves, as early as possible, to define core values (however loose) in some formalised way. A lot of those might be implicit right now through the IRL meeting. I would be happy to join a group who is working on this. For CoTech, this was as short and simple as https://wiki.coops.tech/wiki/CoTech_Constitution.
For the moment, as the network is still in buildin phase, participants of the Amsterdam meeting are the members. Others can be vouched for to work with a friends of friends trust method until the network has some more solid definition to accept members more largely.
To be part of the network you should be an active member. What is means is still to be defined, but something like contributin an hour per month … (learning from the CHATONS story)
We talked a bit about requirements to join, or get kicked out. The followint are just loose notes of our chattings, nothing decided yet :
Libre Hosters should provide help for each other
No hate speech
FLOSS (using and producing) also non software stuff we produce should be open
OS HAS to be free software
give report on proprietary software they are using
100%? can I be a LH if I use 10% non free software? – need to be transparent why the proprietary is necessary, try to improve together
drivers are fine
sharing documentation
transparency of organisation
Making money should not be your motivation (not paying more than X times the minimum wage for example)