Here is how the CPP bound them together:
So here, openness does not play a role. These two share a common culture and goal, and the following ones share ethics…
We use these two words because they mean something together, and they cannot be reduced to “openness”. Transparency without fairness is surveillance. “Fairness” without transparency is complacency.
Portability is not security. It’s the ability of users to choose their provider. Not at all the same thing. I think security is a general concern in our profession, but this is not what we mean here.
I completely agree that accessibility is an important concern. But I don’t think we understand the same thing about this term. What I mean when I use Accessibility, is A11y, which refers to the accessibility of a computer system to all people, regardless of disability type or severity of impairment. What you seem to mean in that sentence is “low price”, which I really do not care about, since some of us are non-profits giving away their services for no fee, and others are commercial entities depending on customer paying a fair fee for their services. As with “free as in freedom, not as in free beer” Accessibility (A11y) has nothing to do with price.
Well, I agree with what’s written on the web home page, not with your choice of words, so I’d rather have people working on the logo from this understanding and not yours.