Organization name, Logo and other attributes like that can be sent on SAML also, not sure if itās useful just yet but might allow for some interesting uses during authentication federation.
homeUrl should be simply url (a property of Organization). logoUrl should be logo. languages should be a repetition of availableLanguage (?)⦠Other fields are not present in schema.org and itās not entirely clear to me how to represent specific URLs that are not defined for an Organization, does that mean we should create a libreho.st JSON-LD schema to represent a LibreHoster, @pierreozoux?
Without mentioning meta object to insert an arbitrary JSON object for future extensions and local additions.
@how yes this is messy at the moment.
I try to get involved on the schemaorg github repo to try to better understand.
I donāt think we need a LibreHoster schema, but maybe we will, who knows
I noticed that @kate put the JSON file for WebArchitects.Coop at /librehost-api/librehost.json instead of /librehost.json.
If this is OK, then we should modify the documentation and eventually come up with a /.well-known/ solution to dereference the URL to the right file. IMO itās overkill and we should stick to /librehost.json unless thereās a good reason not to.
currently āYYYYā (it was based on the hello-matrix āSinceā column). Changing to āYYYY-MM-DDā is the same for me as the consumer of the json can still decide what to display. Both are ISO 8601 date format.
Heyo, following https://lab.libreho.st/librehosters/librehost-api/issues/4, I started to play around with building a tool yesterday and itās available to play with (warning: pre-alpha). It can help to manage things with the schema and also explore the network (via each memberās schema). Check the documentation at:
By using the tool, I discovered that both libreops.cc and linux.pizza are using a version 0.0.2 of the schema but we seem to have not updated the ālatestā version at https://lab.libreho.st/librehosters/librehost-api/blob/master/librehost.json (still on 0.0.1)? Is there some agreement for increasing the version number?
Thereās no version 0.0.2 of the schema yet. I suppose they have updated their entries and bumped the version. Itās not so clear this version is the schema version.